Skip to main content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.
Research Goals for Upper Level Students
Students conducting research in upper-level courses are developing familiarity with the conventions and shape of the conversation within the discipline. They should also become familiar with specialized sources used within the discipline. Our assessment plan (pdf) outlines goals for all students; students in upper-level courses will be able to identify key research tools, locate high quality sources, articulate salient elements of research within their discipline, and use sources effectively as they enter the scholarly conversation.
Students are fully capable of developing a sense of how scholarly research is reported and how to construct a good research project.
- However, undergraduates must spend far more time than experts in gaining enough background knowledge to find a focus for a research project.
- They also have understandable difficulty assessing the value of different sources, not being familiar with the prominent scholars in the field and its major publications. It's a good idea to scaffold assignments with multiple check points.
Don't assume students learned how to use the library in the FTS. What they learned was limited, may have been forgotten, or may not take into account recent changes in the Library.
Students tell us they learn by doing and they learn from the models provided by their professors. The most important predictor of students' success in finding, reading, and using sources is the number of times they engage in those activities. The librarians are happy to discuss assignments you are designing.
How Sophomores, Juniors and Seniors See the Library & Undergraduate Research
In addition to struggling to varying degrees with the issues they faced as first-year students, students beyond the first year engage in several common research behaviors. They tend to do the following things.
- They often begin their research on Google in order to establish the parameters of a topic.
- If they use a library database, they are most familiar with Academic Search Premier (a general database containing both scholarly and popular articles in all disciplines, much of it in full text) rather than a subject-specific database. JSTOR and Google Scholar are also fairly familiar and popular.
- They tend to return to whatever database worked before, whether or not it's appropriate.
- They are reluctant to persevere if searches don't immediately yield "perfect" results - and often change topics rather than change search strategies.
- They often start with a thesis and try to find materials to support their argument, rather than reading existing literature on a topic and formulating a thesis from what they've read.
- They are often quick to dismiss arguments that don't support their thesis.
- They have difficulty locating books on the library shelves.
- Many are nervous about approaching the reference desk and using interlibrary loan.
- They don't always think to mine cited works, and they rarely know how to track them down.
- They struggle with integrating sources, especially figuring out how their own voice is a part of the conversation. "Literature review" is a new concept to most students.
- They are very confident about their ability to do research online.
- Their professors are the most important source of advice about which sources to use. Other students are more likely to be viewed as valuable informants about sources than librarians are.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License